Who really created the world?

I took a great class last semester and one particular lecture was on development politics and representation and knowledge and power and consciousness and all that kind of abstract, brain-hurty subject matter. Here’s an excerpt from one of the better articles I read – The Re-invention of Africa, Edward Said, V. Y. Mudimbe and Beyond by Ali Mazrui (2005) – a few interesting thoughts on history and racism that have been swirling around my head again lately…

One of the paradoxes of history is that it took Africa’s contact with the Arab world to make the Black people of Africa realize that they were black in description, but not necessarily in status. The term “Sudan,” meaning “the Black ones,” carries no pejorative implications. That is why Africa’s largest country in territory (capital Khartoum) still proudly calls itself “Sudan.” In a European language one cannot imagine an African country calling itself today “Black Land,” let alone “Negrostan,” as the name of a modern state.

On the other hand, it took European conceptualization and cartography to turn Africa into a continent. To Europeans “black” was not merely descriptive; it was also judgmental. Arabs alerted the people of sub-Saharan Africa that they were black. Europe tried to convince Black people that they were inferior.


If Africa invented man in places like Olduvai Gorge, and the Semites invented God in Jerusalem, Mt. Sinai, and Mecca, Europe invented the world, at the Greenwich Meridian. It was Europeans who named all the great continents of the world, all the great oceans, many of the great rivers and lakes and most of the countries. Europe positioned the world so that we think of Europe as being above Africa rather than below in the cosmos. Europe timed the world so that the Greenwich meridian chimed the universal hour.


In Africa itself European racism convinced at least sub-Saharan Africans that one of the most relevant criteria of their Africanity was their skin color. Until the coming of the Arabs and the Europeans into the sub-Saharan region, Blackness was taken relatively for granted. Fairer-skinned Arabs sometimes penetrated the interior of Black Africa, but the Arabs were less segregationist than Europeans and were ready to intermarry with local populations. The primary differentiation between Arab and non-Arab was not skin color but language and culture. It was Europeans who raised the barrier of pigmentation higher in Africa. A new version of Orientalism gathered momentum.


3 thoughts on “Who really created the world?

  1. Said’s Orientalism remains a close second to Polanyi’s The Great Transformation as the most insightful book I’ve ever read. If I manage to come up with some kind of Grand Unifying Theory of “X” like they did, I’ll consider my life’s work to be complete. How do you get to see the world they did? I don’t know. But I’d like to.

  2. Haha from memory, I actually think I told you that if he wasn’t already dead, I’d consider marrying Edward Said… was that you?? Your reply was that I was the third girl who had expressed such sentiments to you that week haha.

  3. That definitely sounds like something I would have said. Mr. Said is clearly very popular with the ladies, even beyond the grave. The Sociological Elvis, perhaps?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s